



































 |
Otitis Media (middle ear inflammation)
The most frequent primary diagnosis at
visits to US physician offices by children younger than 15 years. Otitis
media particularly affects infants and preschoolers: almost all children
experience one or more episodes of otitis media before age 6.
The American Academy of Pediatrics, the
American Academy of Family Physicians, and the American Academy of
Otolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery, with the review and approval of the
Agency for Health Care Policy and Research of the US Department of Health
and Human Services, convened a panel of experts to develop a guideline on
otitis media for providers and consumers of health care for young children.
Providers include primary care and specialist physicians, professional
nurses and nurse practitioners, physician assistants, audiologists,
speech-language pathologists, and child development specialists. Because the
term otitis media encompasses a range of diseases, from acute to chronic and
with or without symptoms, the Otitis Media Guideline Panel narrowed the
topic. Two types of otitis media often encountered by clinicians were
considered:
| |
 |
Acute otitis media--fluid in the
middle ear accompanied by signs or symptoms of ear infection (bulging
eardrum usually accompanied by pain; or perforated eardrum, often with
drainage of purulent material). |
|
| |
 |
Otitis media with effusion--fluid
in the middle ear without signs or symptoms of ear infection.
|
|
| |
 |
The Clinical Practice Guideline,
Otitis Media with Effusion in Young Children, and this reference
guide, discuss only otitis media with effusion. Furthermore, the
Guideline and this document narrow their discussion of the
identification and management of otitis media with effusion to a very
specific "target patient": |
|
| |
 |
A child age 1 through 3 years;
|
|
| |
 |
with no craniofacial or neurologic
abnormalities or sensory deficits; |
|
| |
 |
and who is healthy except for
otitis media with effusion. |
|
When the scientific evidence for
management permitted, Guideline recommendations were broadened to include
older children.
Top
Highlights Of Patient Management
Congenital or early onset hearing
impairment is widely accepted as a risk factor for impaired speech and
language development. In general, the earlier the hearing problem begins and
the more severe it is, the worse its effects on speech and language
development. Because otitis media with effusion is often associated with a
mild to moderate hearing loss, most clinicians have been eager to treat the
condition to restore hearing to normal and thus prevent any long-term
problems.
Studies of the effects of otitis media
with effusion on hearing have varied in design and have examined several
aspects of hearing and communication skills. Because of these differences,
the results cannot be combined to provide a clear picture of the
relationship between otitis media with effusion and hearing. Also, it is
uncertain whether changes in hearing due to middle ear fluid have any
long-term effects on development. Evidence of dysfunctions mediated by
otitis media with effusion that have persisted into later childhood, despite
resolution of the middle ear fluid and a return to normal hearing, would
provide a compelling argument for early, decisive intervention. There is,
however, no consistent, reliable evidence that otitis media with effusion
has such long-term effects on language or learning.
The following recommendations for managing
otitis media with effusion are tempered by the failure to find rigorous,
methodologically sound research to support the theory that untreated otitis
media with effusion results in speech/language delays or deficits.
Recommendations and options were developed
for the diagnosis and management of otitis media with effusion in otherwise
healthy young children. The following steps parallel the management
algorithm provided at the end of this document.
Top
Diagnosis and Hearing Evaluation
-
Suspect otitis media with effusion in young children. Most
children have at least one episode of otitis media with effusion before
entering school. Otitis media with effusion may be identified following
an acute episode of otitis media, or it may be an incidental finding.
Symptoms may include discomfort or behavior changes.
-
Use pneumatic otoscopy to assess middle ear status.
Pneumatic otoscopy is recommended for assessment of the middle ear
because it combines visualization of the tympanic membrane (otoscopy)
with a test of membrane mobility (pneumatic otoscopy). When pneumatic
otoscopy is performed by an experienced examiner, the accuracy for
diagnosis of otitis media with effusion may be between 70% and 79%.
-
Tympanometry may be performed to confirm suspected otitis media
with effusion. Tympanometry provides an indirect measure of
tympanic membrane compliance and an estimate of middle ear air pressure.
The positive predictive value of an abnormal (type B, flat) tympanogram
is between 49% and 99%; that is, as few as half of ears with abnormal
tympanograms may have otitis media with effusion. The negative
predictive value of this test is better--the majority of middle ears
with normal tympanograms will in fact be normal. Because the strengths
of tympanometry (it provides a quantitative measure of tympanic membrane
mobility) and pneumatic otoscopy (many abnormalities of the eardrum and
ear canal that can skew the results of tympanometry are visualized)
offset the weaknesses of each, using the two tests together improves the
accuracy of diagnosis.
 |
Acoustic reflectometry has not
been studied well enough for a recommendation to be made for or
against its use to diagnose otitis media with effusion.
|
|
 |
Tuning fork tests: No
recommendation is made regarding the use of tuning fork tests to
screen for or diagnose otitis media with effusion, except to note
that they are inappropriate in the youngest children.
|
|
-
A child who has had fluid in both middle ears for a total of 3 months
should undergo hearing evaluation. Before 3 months of effusion, hearing
evaluation is an option. A change in hearing threshold is both a
clinical outcome and a possible indicator of the presence of otitis
media with effusion. Methods used to determine a child's hearing acuity
will vary depending on the resources available and the child's
willingness and ability to participate in testing. Optimally, air- and
bone-conduction thresholds can be established for 500, 1000, 2000, and
4000 Hz, and an air-conduction pure tone average can be calculated. This
result should be verified by obtaining a measure of speech sensitivity.
Determinations of speech reception threshold or speech awareness
threshold alone may be used if the child cannot cooperate for pure tone
testing. If none of the test techniques is available or tolerated by the
child, the examiner should use his/her best judgment as to adequacy of
hearing. In these cases, the health care provider should be aware of
whether the child is achieving the appropriate developmental milestones
for verbal communication.
Although hearing evaluation may be difficult to perform in young
children, evaluation is recommended after otitis media with effusion has
been present bilaterally for 3 months, because of the strong belief that
surgery is not indicated unless otitis media with effusion is causing
hearing impairment (defined as equal to or worse than 20 decibels
hearing threshold level in the better-hearing ear).
Natural History
Longitudinal studies of otitis media with
effusion show spontaneous resolution of the condition in more than half of
children within 3 months from development of the effusion. After 3 months
the rate of spontaneous resolution remains constant, so that only a small
percentage of children experience otitis media with effusion lasting a year
or longer. In most children, episodes of otitis media with effusion do not
persist beyond early childhood. The likelihood that middle ear fluid will
resolve by itself underlies the recommendations made for management of
otitis media with effusion.
Top
Environmental Risk Factors
Scientific evidence showed that the
following environmental factors may increase potential risks of getting
acute otitis media or otitis media with effusion:
| |
 | Bottle-feeding rather than breast-feeding infants
|
|
| |
 | Passive smoking |
|
| |
 | Group child-care facility attendance |
|
Because the target child for Guideline
recommendations is beyond the age when the choice of breast-feeding versus
bottle-feeding is an issue, this risk factor was not considered at length.
Passive smoking (exposure to another's
tobacco smoke) is associated with higher risk of otitis media with effusion.
Although there is no proof that stopping passive smoking will help prevent
middle ear fluid, there are many health reasons for not exposing persons of
any age to tobacco smoke. Therefore, clinicians should advise parents of the
benefits of decreasing children's exposure to tobacco smoke.
Studies of otitis media with effusion in
children cared for at home compared to those in group child-care facilities
found that children in group child-care facilities have a slightly higher
relative risk (less than 2.0) of getting otitis media with effusion.
Research did not show whether removing the child from the group child-care
facility helped prevent otitis media with effusion.
Top
Therapeutic Interventions
Observation OR antibiotic therapy are
treatment options for children with effusion that has been present less than
4 to 6 months and at any time in children without a 20-decibel hearing
threshold level or worse in the better-hearing ear. Most cases of otitis
media with effusion resolve spontaneously. Meta-analysis of controlled
studies showed a 14% increase in the resolution rate when antibiotics were
given. Length of treatment in these studies was typically 10 days.
The most common adverse effects of
antibiotic therapy are gastrointestinal. Dermatologic reactions may occur in
3% to 5% of cases; severe anaphylactic reactions are much rarer; severe
hematologic, cardiovascular, central nervous system, endocrine, renal,
hepatic, and respiratory adverse effects are rarer still. The potential for
the development of microbial resistance is always present with antibiotics.
For the child who has had bilateral
effusion for a total of 3 months and who has a bilateral hearing deficiency
(defined as a 20-decibel hearing threshold level or worse in the
better-hearing ear), bilateral myringotomy with tube insertion becomes an
additional treatment option. Placement of tympanostomy tubes is recommended
after a total of 4 to 6 months of bilateral effusion with a bilateral
hearing deficit. The principal benefits of myringotomy with insertion of
tympanostomy tubes are the restoration of hearing to the pre-effusion
threshold and clearance of the fluid and possible feeling of pressure. While
patent and in place, tubes may prevent further accumulation of fluid in the
middle ear. Although there is insufficient evidence to prove that there are
long-term deleterious effects of otitis media with effusion, concern about
the possibility of such effects led the panel to recommend surgery, based on
their expert opinion. Tubes are available in a myriad of designs, most
constructed from plastic and/or metal. Data comparing outcomes with tubes of
various designs are sparse, and so there were assumed to be no notable
differences between available tympanostomy tubes.
Insertion of tympanostomy tubes is
performed under general anesthesia in young children. Calculation of the
risks for two specific complications of myringotomy with tympanostomy tube
insertion showed that tympanosclerosis might occur after this procedure in
51%, and postoperative otorrhea in 13%, of children.
A number of treatments are not recommended
for treatment of otitis media with effusion in the otherwise healthy child
age 1 through 3 years.
| |
 | Steroid medications are not recommended to treat otitis
media with effusion in a child of any age because of limited
scientific evidence that this treatment is effective and the opinion
of many experts that the possible adverse effects (agitation, behavior
change, and more serious problems such as disseminated varicella in
children exposed to this virus within the month before therapy)
outweighed possible benefits. |
|
| |
 | Antihistamine/decongestant therapy is not recommended for
treatment of otitis media with effusion in a child of any age, because
review of the literature showed that these agents are not effective
for this condition, either separately or together. |
|
| |
 | Adenoidectomy is not an appropriate treatment for
uncomplicated middle ear effusion in the child younger than age 4
years when adenoid pathology is not present (based on the lack of
scientific evidence). Potential harms for children of all ages include
the risks of general anesthesia and the possibility of excessive
postoperative bleeding. |
|
| |
 | Tonsillectomy, either alone or with adenoidectomy, has not
been found effective for treatment of otitis media with effusion.
|
|
| |
 | The association between allergy and otitis media with
effusion was not clear from available evidence. Thus, although close
anatomic relationships between the nasopharynx, eustachian tube, and
middle ear have led many experts to suggest a role for allergy
management in treating otitis media with effusion, no recommendation
was made for or against such treatment. |
|
| |
 | Evidence regarding other therapies for the treatment of
otitis media with effusion was sought, but no reports of chiropractic,
holistic, naturopathic, traditional/indigenous, homeopathic, or other
treatments contained information obtained in randomized controlled
studies. Therefore, no recommendation was made regarding such other
therapies for the treatment of otitis media with effusion in children.
|
|
Top
What
is Eustachian Tube?
|
1 Tympanic Membrane
|
2 Maleus Incus Stapes
|
|
3 Semicircular canals
|
4 Cochlea
|
|
5 Cochlear Nerve
|
6 Oval Window
|
|
7 Eustachian Tube
|
8 Orifice
|
|
9 Round Window
|
10 Middle Ear Cavity
|
The Eustachian tube is only channel of communication between the
nasopharynx and the middle ear for the purpose of equalizing the pressure of
the external air and that contained in the middle ear (see figure).
The natural ventilator of the middle ear is the eustachian
tube. The middle ear is aerated only when the eustachian tube is opened,
which take place during the act of deglutition. The tube is otherwise
closed, so intended by nature to protect the middle ear from unnecessary
exposure from the nasopharynx.
Large pressures in the middle ear cavity can affect the inner ear by way of
the cochlear windows(Round window and Oval window).
When you travel by plane, you may
sometimes feel ear fullness. But this feeling will disappear by swallowing
or chewing. Your Eustachian Tube is working in this way.
Top
Treatment Outcomes
The Table summarizes the benefits and
harms identified for management interventions in the target child with
otitis media with effusion.
Outcomes
of Treating Otitis Media With Effusion *
|
Intervention |
Benefits‡ |
Harms‡ |
| Observation |
Base case |
Base case |
| Antibiotics |
Improved clearance of effusion at 1
month or |
Nausea, vomiting, diarrhea (2% to 32%
depending on |
| |
less, 14.0% (95% CI [3.6%, 24.2%]);
possible |
dose and antibiotic); cutaneous
reactions (<= 5%); |
| |
reduction in future infections |
numerous rare organ system effects,
including very |
| |
|
rare fatalities; cost; possible
development of resistant |
| |
|
strains of bacteria |
| Antibiotics plus steroids |
Possible improved clearance at 1 month,
25.1% |
See antibiotics and steroids separately |
| |
(95% CI [-1.3%, 49.9%])§; possible
reduction |
|
| |
in future infections. |
|
| Steroids alone |
Possible improved clearance at 1 month,
4.5% |
Possible exacerbation of varicella;
long-term |
| |
(95% CI [-11.7%, 20.6%])§ |
complications not established for low
doses; cost |
| Antihistamine/decongestant |
Same as base case |
Drowsiness and/or excitability¶; cost |
| Myringotomy with tubes |
Immediate clearance of effusion in all
children; |
Invasive procedure; anesthesia risk;
cost; |
| |
improved hearing |
tympanosclerosis; otorrhea; possible
restrictions on |
| |
|
swimming |
| Adenoidectomy |
Benefits for young children have not
been |
Invasive procedure¶; anesthesia risk;
cost |
| |
established |
|
| Tonsillectomy |
Same as base case |
Invasive procedure¶; anesthesia risk;
cost |
* The target patient is an otherwise
healthy child age 1 through 3 years with no craniofacial or neurologic
abnormalities or sensory deficits.
‡ Outcomes are reported as differences
from observation, which is treated as the base case. When possible,
meta-analysis was performed to provide a mean and associated confidence
interval (CI).
§ Difference from base case not
statistically significant.
¶ Risks were not examined in detail
because no benefits were identified.
Top
Algorithm
The notes below are an integral part of
the algorithm that follows.
-
Otitis media with effusion (OME) is defined as fluid in the middle ear
without signs or symptoms of infection; OME is not to be confused with
acute otitis media (inflammation of the middle ear with signs of
infection). The Guideline and this algorithm apply only to the child
with otitis media with effusion. This algorithm assumes follow up
intervals of 6 weeks.
-
The algorithm applies only to a child age 1 through 3 years with no
craniofacial or neurologic abnormalities or sensory deficits (except as
noted) who is healthy except for otitis media with effusion. The
Guideline recommendations and algorithm do not apply if the child has
any craniofacial or neurologic abnormality (for example, cleft palate or
mental retardation) or sensory deficit (for example, decreased visual
acuity or pre-existing hearing deficit).
-
The Panel found some evidence that pneumatic otoscopy is more accurate
than otoscopy performed without the pneumatic test of eardrum mobility.
-
Tympanometry may be used as confirmation of pneumatic otoscopy in the
diagnosis of OME. Hearing evaluation is recommended for the otherwise
healthy child who has had bilateral OME for 3 months; before 3 months,
hearing evaluation is a clinical option.
-
In most cases, OME resolves spontaneously within 3 months.
-
The antibiotic drugs studied for treatment of OME were amoxicillin,
amoxicillin-clavulanate potassium, cefaclor, erythromycin, erythromycin-sulfisoxazole,
sulfisoxazole, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.
- Exposure to cigarette smoke (passive smoking) has been
shown to increase the risk of OME. For bottle-feeding versus
breast-feeding and for child-care facility placement, associations were
found with OME, but evidence available to the Panel did not show decreased
incidence of OME with breast-feeding or with removal from child-care
facilities.
-
The recommendation against tonsillectomy is based on the lack of added
benefit from tonsillectomy when combined with adenoidectomy to treat
otitis media with effusion in older children. Tonsillectomy and
adenoidectomy may be appropriate for reasons other than otitis media
with effusion.
-
The Panel found evidence that decongestants and/or antihistamines are
ineffective treatments for otitis media with effusion.
-
Meta-analysis failed to show a significant benefit for steroid
medications without antibiotic medications in treating otitis media with
effusion in children.
|
ALGORITHM for managing otitis media with effusion in
an otherwise healthy child age 1 to 3 years
 |
Top
|